Aviation oils (a bit of research done for my glider club)

I did a little research on engine oils, here is what I’ve found, starting with a summary valid for our horizontally opposed six cylinder engine:

  1. Summary: our options appear to be:
    • Aeroshell W100 and CamGuard
    • Aeroshell 15W50 by itself  (it already has additives for antiwear/corrosion)
    • Aeroshell W100Plus by itself  (already has additives for antiwear/corrosion)
    • Phillips 66 X/C 20W50 and CamGuard


Based on this I recommend a single weight oil in summer, so W100 and CamGuard is a good option there. Full disclosure, I’m a CamGuard believer, I use it with every oil change on my 180 (whose engine is now 700+ hours over TBO btw).

I recommend a multi weight oil in winter unless we are very diligent about thoroughly preheating the engine. From the above, it appears we can use 15W50 by itself, or Phillips 66 X/C 20W50 and CamGuard. Personally I’d lean toward the latter, with our application.

I derive this summary from the information below, which came from two articles:

  • Oil types: Quoted from boldmethod.com: There are two main oil types used in aircraft engines: mineral oil and ashless dispersant (AD) oil. Both types are made of mineral oil – a refined, petroleum based oil. However, AD oils have added chemicals (additives), which collect debris inside the engine and carry them to the oil filter. Unlike mineral and AD oil, synthetic oil is not made from whole crude oil. There are some synthetic blend oils used in aircraft engines, but they aren’t as common. Shell Oil tested all-synthetic oils in aircraft engines, and what they found wasn’t good. At 600 to 900 hours, the engines began to burn more oil and lost compression. “When the engines were disassembled, we found that the piston rings were covered with a gray tacky substance that was primarily made up of the lead by-products of combustion.”

  • Break in oil: also quoted from boldmethod: Many pilots have learned to use straight mineral oil while breaking in a new engine. It’s thought that mineral oil is less viscous (less slippery) than AD oil, and that it will allow the piston rings to wear in the cylinder walls more quickly. However, not all manufacturers recommend this practice. The Continental Motors engine break-in guide recommends straight mineral oil, while Lycoming recommends AD oil when breaking in all turbocharged engines. What should you use? Check your engine’s manual and follow the manufacturer’s instructions – always the best bet for long engine life.

  • Oil selection: Quoted from AOPA: When selecting oil, the first thing to consider is viscosity. Simply put, “viscosity” is the measure of a fluid’s resistance to flow. Most air-cooled aircraft engines are designed for SAE 50-weight oil at operating temperature (approximately 210 degrees Fahrenheit).

    In fairly stable, warm environments, a straight-weight oil such as Aeroshell 100, W100 or Phillips 100AW is a good option because these 100 oils all perform to the SAE 50 spec. In slightly cooler temperatures, straight-weight 80 oils will also work for some engines because they perform to SAE 40. If you have ever had to break in a new engine, you may have been told to use mineral oil. Mineral oil is a straight-weight oil that has no chemical additives and is typically used in engine and cylinder break-in to assist with the seating of rings.

    For performance across a wider range of temperatures, it’s best to use multi-weight oil. Multi-weight oils are typically semi-synthetic, utilizing an added polymer to make the oil flow like a lower-viscosity oil in colder temperatures, yet still perform the same as a straight-weight SAE 50 oil at operating temperature. The most common multi-weight oils are AeroShell 15W50, Phillips 66 X/C 20W50, and Exxon Elite 20W50. The numbers in the name of the oil indicate the range of straight-weight oils that the multi-grade covers. For example, Phillips 66 X/C 20W50 oil has the viscosity of 20 weight oil in low temperatures for faster lubrication on cold starts and the viscosity of a 50 weight oil in high temperatures to protect the engine after it is fully warmed up.

  • Additives:  again quoted from AOPA: The first and most important type of additives is ashless dispersants (AD). Ashless dispersant oils have an additive in them to aid in scavenging debris and carrying it to the filter or screen. This is a very important quality, given the relatively high wear of aircraft engines and the amount of combustion acids and other contaminants that get past the cylinder rings and valves.

    Finally, the last category of additives is anti-wear and anti-corrosion additives. Oils such as Exxon Elite 20W50, Aeroshell 15W50, Aeroshell W100Plus, and Phillips 66 100AW include varying combinations of anti-wear and/or anti-corrosive additives. That said, products such as ASL CamGuard and AVblend can be added directly to non-additive oils such as Phillips 66 X/C 20W50. In these times when airplanes are flying less, I recommend using some sort of anti-corrosion additive in your oil. Please note that these are both FAA-approved additives. You should never use an unapproved additive, regardless of what you might hear around the hangar water-cooler.

Installed uAvionix ADS-B solution on my 180

Ok, aviation post for a change. (I should post more aviation posts.) I decided recently to acquire a uAvionix tail beacon ADS-B unit. It’s described here: https://uavionix.com/products/tailbeacon/ .  I wanted something in 1099 but the price here was hard to beat and I wasn’t ready for the 1099 solution, which includes other stuff I need to get, for example replacing one of my comm radios. I need to save more money.

This solution was trivial to install. I ran the checkout flight the other day and it went pretty much flawlessly. Bottom line is follow the directions and it’ll likely work out well. uAvionix tells you how to do it here: https://uavionix.com/support/skybeacon/flying-a-performance-or-rebate-flight/ . I left kFLY after a good solid 15 minute warmup, flew over COS for over 30 minutes, and did some 360s as indicated in the directions.

A colleague of my IA’s wrote this up about my result: 

The report is a passing report and the unit is effectively certified.  A hard copy of the report should be placed with the aircraft paperwork.  A logbook entry is required that states the ADSB unit was tested as per FAR 91.225 and shown to meet FAR 91.227.  There is annual continued airworthiness that must be performed as per the Continued Airworthiness Manual that should be printed and placed with the aircraft paperwork.

It looks like he did not wait long enough for the GPS system to meet the WAAS standards and that is what caused the very small percentage of NIC/NACp errors.  It is still a passing report, so just advise Jim to wait a little longer before takeoff.

The advice to wait longer is sound, but after waiting 15 minutes to depart, I think kFLY is simply in an ADS-B hole. Anyway, I had a good experience here and I hope yours is equally good. Please let me know if you have any questions and I will try to answer them.

Oh, here is my report, suitably sanitized and kinda totally outta format but you’ll get it if you have seen other reports. You get your report after your flight here: https://adsbperformance.faa.gov/PAPRRequest.aspx .

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration ADS-B Performance Monitor 

Public ADS-B Performance Report
Broadcast ICAO: A8A255 (52121125) 

Period: 10-19-2019 21:45:33 to 10-19-2019 22:28:23 

Operation Analysis Overview 

Airborne UAT 

Prepared By 

Surveillance and Broadcast Services (SBS) Program ADS-B Performance Monitor 

October 20, 2019 

Note: Items high-lighted in red within this report indicate the ADS-B Out system installed on this aircraft failed to meet the corresponding performance requirement as specified in § 91.227. 

For more information on this report, reference the User’s Guide.
OMB Control No. 2120-0728 | Expiration Date 4/30/2017 

Operation Summary 

Operation Id: 412384628 Start Time: 10-19-2019 21:45:33     End Time: 10-19-2019 22:28:23 

Broadcast ICAO: A8A255 (52121125) 

Duration: 00:42:50 Reports: 13371 Stationary: No 

Mod: 00:42:50 Best Msg: 2539 Baro Alt (ft): 

Rule: 00:40:48 

TIS-B Client: 97.6% 6800 – 10900 

Link Version: Last Flight Id: Operator: 

Airborne 

Surface 

Out Capability: 

UAT

In Capability: DUAL 

Airborne 

UAT Analysis Summary 

Start Time: 10-19-2019 21:45:33 Duration(s): 00:42:50 Mod: 00:42:50 

Link Version: 2
Emitter Category: 1 – Light (<15,500lbs) Last Flight Id: N6555A 

Exceptions: 

End Time: 10-19-2019 22:28:23 Rule: 00:40:48 

Out Capability: UAT Antenna(s): 1 – Single 

Total Reports: 13371 Processed Reports: 2511 

In Capability: DUAL 

NIC NACp NACv SIL SDA 
No No No No No 
page3image59771904

Airborne UAT Analysis 

Missing Elements 

Category NACp NACv Vel Flight Id Mode 3A Emit Cat Baro Alt Geo Alt 
% Fail 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 
Max dT 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 
MCF 

Integrity & Accuracy 

Category NIC NACp NACv SIL SDA 
% Fail 0.12% 0.12% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% 
Max dT 00:00:04 00:00:05 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 
MCF 
Category NIC NACp NACv SIL SDA 
Avg 8.3 9.2 1.8 3.0 2.0 
Min 
Max 10 10 

Kinematics 

Other Checks 

Velocity Position Δ 
% Fail 0.00% 0.00% 
MCF 
Baro Alt Baro Alt Δ Geo Alt Geo Alt Δ 
0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.08% 
Emitter Cat Mode 3A 
% Fail 0.00% 0.00% 
Max dT 00:00:00 00:00:00 
MCF 
Flight ID Tail # Mismatch Non-US No “N” Only “N” Partial Spaces All Spaces Illegal Char Unavail Char FP ID Mismatch 
% Fail 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 
Max dT 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 
MCF 
Air on Ground 
% Fail 0.00% 
Max dT 00:00:00 
MCF 

Note: The above FP ID Mismatch field can be disregarded when no flight plan was filed for the associated flight. 

page4image60218880

Airborne UAT Analysis Page 4 of 6 

This page intentionally left blank. 

page5image60219456

Airborne UAT Analysis Page 5 of 6 

This page intentionally left blank. 

page6image60220032

Airborne UAT Analysis Page 6 of 6